renalweb.groupee.net
RenalWEB Discussion Forums
Dialysis Technician Forums
Dialysis Technical Forum
F-70NR|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
| <Nick>
|
What are the advantages of a F-70NR over a F-8 ?
|
||
|
| <BillK.>
|
Its better for phosphorous and B2M clearance.
|
||
|
| <Nick>
|
Anyone know the composition of the two dialyzers?
|
||
|
Nick,
They are both made of the same material (polysulfone) but manufacturing process is different which gives them different clearance characteristics. |
||||
|
The F-70 NR can be considered a High Flux Dialyzer with A very larger surface area and a high UFR. I have expereinced trouble with this when a patients with low goal weights and long run times cause machine low TMP alarms. The end result is a continuosly howling machine that patient care staff interprets as machine related. Also there is a danger of Backfiltration. I eventually dumpe the F-70 For an F-80M. This had a much lower UFR but practically the same clearances as the F-70.
If its a question of a good Non reusable dialyzer stick to F-7's whitch have closer clearances to the F_8 as your main, all purpose dialyzer, and use the F-70 sparingly. |
||||
|
pbdtech,
Let me guess, you use Althin machines? We have the exact same problem with the TMP alarms. The basic software for the machines was written before high-flux dialyzers were widely used. We have addressed this issue with Baxter on numerous occations, requesting that they re-write the software so that high-flux dialyzers can be used without getting these alarms. Their responce is basically that they will think about it (which means don't hold your breath). |
||||
|
| Previous Topic | Next Topic | powered by eve community |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|

